Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
January 02, 2025, 07:33:47 am

Login with username, password and session length


Members
  • Total Members: 6315
  • Latest: DRG
Stats
  • Total Posts: 55137
  • Total Topics: 4855
  • Online Today: 231
  • Online Ever: 3061
  • (September 25, 2024, 11:40:40 pm)
Users Online
Users: 0
Guests: 213
Total: 213

Welcome

Welcome to the Hep Forums, a round-the-clock discussion area for people who have Fatty Liver Disease, Hepatitis B, C or a co-infection, their friends and family and others with questions about hepatitis and liver health. Check in frequently to read what others have to say, post your comments, and hopefully learn more about how you can reach your own health goals.

Privacy Warning: Please realize that these forums are open to all, and are fully searchable via Google and other search engines. If this concerns you, then do not use a username or avatar that are self-identifying in any way. We do not allow the deletion of anything you post in these forums, so think before you post.
  • The information shared in these forums, by moderators and members, is designed to complement, not replace, the relationship between an individual and his/her own physician.
  • All members of these forums are, by default, not considered to be licensed medical providers. If otherwise, users must clearly define themselves as such.
  • Product advertisement (including links); banners; and clinical trial, study or survey participation—is strictly prohibited by forums members unless permission has been secured from the Hep Forum Moderators.
Finished Reading This? You can collapse this or any other box on this page by clicking the symbol in each box.

Author Topic: Re-compensated SVR rates  (Read 6322 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline sickpuppy

  • Member
  • Posts: 51
Re-compensated SVR rates
« on: August 01, 2015, 04:50:46 pm »
So, I'm an abnormal case. I've never been compensated (well, maybe, but I didn't know, I was under 10 years old).

I was infected at age 1-2 (probably, based on liver progression) and discovered at age 11-12 when I bled out from varices. The next 4 years were very hard. Another 3 episodes of bleeding, high ammonia (apparently that's a sign for HE, but I don't remember having it, pun intended). After that, things went quiet. Varices resolved (now there's no sign of ever having them) and ammonia levels are normal. I feel fine and bloodwork is CPT A, borderline CPT B. MELD fluctuates between 12 and 14.

To the point: I've been decompensated, then re-compensated and stayed that way. If you want a better description and "re-compensated" does not sit well with you, then let's call it "mildy decompensated" or "on the edge of the fucking cliff".

SVR rates for decompensated patients were lower than that for compensated patients.

I guess I'm in between, but I just wanted to hear some thoughts on this. What do you think actually affects the SVR rates so much between a compensated and decompensated cirrhotic?
GT1a - TX-naive

Baseline:

16.2 kPa
ALT: 61 iu/L
ALP: 74 iu/L
Albumin: 38g/L
Bilirubin: 27 umol/L
Platelets: 80
VL: 792,000
History of 4 violent varices bleeding episodes and splenomegaly present.

21/07/15 - TX start - Harvoni + Ribavirin 12 weeks.
Week 2 - UND
Week 4 - UND
Week 8 - UND
13/10/15 Week 12 - UND
19/11/15 - SVR4
8/1/16 - SVR12 !!!!!

Offline sickpuppy

  • Member
  • Posts: 51
Re: Re-compensated SVR rates
« Reply #1 on: August 01, 2015, 05:04:00 pm »
Found my answer:

"Duration of Therapy

There are three main factors involved in the debate about whether it will ultimately be preferable to treat patients for longer durations or to treat patients with more drugs, according to Brown. “One is that we may not be getting drugs into every place we need to because of fibrosis or portosystemic shunting. The second is that there may be impaired immune function leading to viral persistence,” he said. “The third is that cirrhotics have had the disease longer. The first two argue for longer therapy and the last one argues for more drugs.”

Feld built on this point. “People with cirrhosis may also respond less well because of poor drug metabolism and impaired tolerability,” he said. “It may well vary from regimen to regimen, but on balance I would say that that longer duration will be more helpful in cirrhosis than more drugs.”

Full article here: http://www.healio.com/infectious-disease/hepatitis-c/news/print/hcv-next/%7B5a302f58-1018-4a5f-bc38-8c80c2772a32%7D/a-matter-of-compensation-hcv-and-cirrhosis?page=2

Bottom point: Portal hypertension causes the body to grow new veins and habits of transporting blood around it (like a clogged freeway, with drivers choosing alternative routes). This leads to the drugs not getting in hard to get places, where they should. Fibrosis and scarring also harbors hard to reach places. Longer TX duration might solve this.

Interesting article.
GT1a - TX-naive

Baseline:

16.2 kPa
ALT: 61 iu/L
ALP: 74 iu/L
Albumin: 38g/L
Bilirubin: 27 umol/L
Platelets: 80
VL: 792,000
History of 4 violent varices bleeding episodes and splenomegaly present.

21/07/15 - TX start - Harvoni + Ribavirin 12 weeks.
Week 2 - UND
Week 4 - UND
Week 8 - UND
13/10/15 Week 12 - UND
19/11/15 - SVR4
8/1/16 - SVR12 !!!!!

Offline dragonslayer

  • Member
  • Posts: 873
Re: Re-compensated SVR rates
« Reply #2 on: August 01, 2015, 05:45:49 pm »
Excellent find, Pup. Thanks for posting..
Paul

DX 2008
Started Harvoni 11/26/14 for 8 wks
Completed 8 wks Harvoni 01/20/15
EOT RNA Quant result:  Detected 29
7.5 wk post tx: Detected < LLOQ(12)
11 wk post tx: UNDETECTED SVR12
24 wk post tx: UNDETECTED SVR24; AST 26; ALT 22; ALP 73
48 wk post tx: UNDETECTED SVR48; AST 18; ALT 18; ALP 70
GT 1a
vl 2.4mil
2008 bpx: Stage&Grade 0
2013 bpx: Stage&Grade: 0-1
IL28B: TT
likely infected early '70s

 


© 2024 Smart + Strong. All Rights Reserved.   terms of use and your privacy
Smart + Strong® is a registered trademark of CDM Publishing, LLC.